Hi,
I hadn't explicitly put \cite in the document, I'd used insert citation
from the menu with my own bibtex file referenced at the end.
If I export the file as tex, I don't get any \citename tags in it, but I
still can't compile it with latex because it reports undefined references
(points to no .bbl file). If I run bibtex to create the bbl file, I still
get nowhere and it complains about \citenames again :-(
It isn't the only error though, there are three.. considering I'd only put
two citation references in the document, that's pretty high!
Is there a known issue with RedHat regarding missing files or packages
that I should have installed to get this going? I am using
\usepackage{cite} in my preamble, is this correct? I can't imagine that
other people suffer with this problem so I can't help thinking that this
is something really stupid that has come up many times before, but looking
in the archives didn't give me any clues :-(
Thanks,
Duncan
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Duncan Milburn wrote:
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I've just taken the brave step of replacing my previous RedHat installation with a
>fresh 7.0.
> >
> > Now I wish I hadn't bothered because with the simplest document including
>citations from my trusty .bib file I get the following on compilation of the
>PostScript file:
> >
> > Undefined control sequence.
> > ..[\protect\citename{Inc, }1985]{PostScript}
>
> try ...\cite{Inc,...
>
> Herbert
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://perce.de/lyx/
>
