On mar, 09 mai 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes à écrit
>Of course, this scheme means that no new feature is added to 1.1.4
>in the "fix" series (that's what they are: just boring bug fixes).
>
>So, are there other people who think that this is confusing?
>
in fact your explanations are very clear (for me). I think the problem is
elsewhere.
You are going too fast from "pre" to full version. The "stable" version is
NOT stable. If one subscribe for a long time to this mailing list (as I do
for now), he knows that it's not wise to use the first stable release.
Better wait.
May be the 'alpha" and "beta" numbering would be more clear, for with pre,
one can't know how many pre numbers will come. an alpha release should be
unstable (the actual pre, could have alpha1, 2...), a beta one nearly
stable, acceptable for most users, the actual and a full version absolutly
stable (never fixed, in fact, only a bug list added if necessary).
--
<http://www.dodin.net> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
QUI EST CET HOMME ? Aidez-moi à le retrouver
WHO'S THAT GUY ? Help me find him.
http://www.dodin.net/serge/index.html
