Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Yes, I've heard about this problem... I do not know what a good
| solution would be in this case. A special case for gcc 2.95? I am sure
| other software projects have this problem too. It would be interesting
| to know how it has been fixed.
Note that this will also be a problem when the new C standard is out,
since it like C++ does not allow implicit return types on functions.
The correct solution is for the X(Free) team to correct their header
files.
Lgb
