On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, John Levon wrote:
> Mike, I haven't had an "OK" from you on this patch. Is it ok for 1.2.0 ?
Arg, I didn't help myself by updating Customization - I have many rejected
chunks when trying to apply your patch, mostly due to the new inset code.
Is your patch 1.2.0 specific, or does it apply to 1.1.6 as well? If "1.1.6
as well" could you redo it with 1.1.6fix2? If not, then we should decide
if the docs are sufficiently accurate for 1.1.6 that it is time to truly
split off with 1.2.0. (John, note that I converted your Intro changes of a
couple of weeks ago back to 1.1.6.) I decided we jumped the gun a bit on
the 1.1.6/1.2.0 split, but I no longer foresee any changes to the 1.1.6
docs, unless someone comes up with some errors Real Soon Now.
As a side note, I've noticed that diffs are a terrible way of trying to
see what is different in a LyX doc. The diff itself is impossible to read
(and this will be especially true as we convert 1.1.6 to 1.2.0 with all
the inset changes), and applying the doc and opening it in LyX doesn't
provide any way to easily see the changes (anyone want to code a diff mode
into LyX :-) Perhaps we should do something "silly" like put all edits in
blue or underlined or something until the change is mutually agreed on or
some such. Any recommendations for dealing with this?
Mike
P.S. I rather like my LyX diff mode idea --- would this be codable, or is
it just too messy to contemplate?
--
Mike Ressler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I'm lame: I don't have my own website ...
