Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
| > From a pragmatic point of view, using QString would have been a lot
| > less work than what remains to be done, which, quite frankly, scares
| > me a lot.
|
| it is very nice to have theoretical support obscure languages such as
| phoenician, but it seems to me that there is a lot of energy going
| into rolling our own unicode support.
|
| any estimation of when the transition to LUL (LyX Unicode Library) is
| finished?
|
| (and no, i am not gonna tell you guys what lul means in dutch...;-)
|
| how easy would it be to switch to qstring?
Oh how I wish for a friday.
(basically you seem to be spreading your own fud.)
--
Lgb
