Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > "Michael Gerz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | > Abdelrazak> You guys should forget about qt3 in trunk. Just
| > | > Abdelrazak> concentrate on 1.4!
| > | >
| > | > So that you can say that the code is not up to date anymore... ;)
| > | | Seriously, do we really want to keep the qt3 frontend for 1.5? I
| > see
| > | no real reason to maintain two almost identical frontends (at least
| > | from a user's perspective), given the fact that QT4 is available also
| > | for older Linux distributions (like mine).
| > | | If I understand correctly, even Lars is willing to ditch qt3
| > under
| > | certain conditions. Lars, are these conditions already fulfilled?
| > Not quite. I'd like to see the conversion to qt4 finished properly so
| > that we can ditch -DQT3_SUPPORT.
|
| That's just nitpicking but anyway...
|
|
| > We don't evne link with libQt3Support.so so it cannot be that hard...
|
| Not really, no. Michael, you said yesterday that you had a patch ready
| for inverting the logic of QT3_SUPPORT. Just commit it.
???
Inverting the logic? it is a Qt4 thing.. not ours.
Or do you mean to put #define QT3_SUPPORT in every file that needs it?
(Isn't that just hiding it under the rug?)
--
Lgb
