On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 11:40:10AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | Python would be extended by, e.g. a module 'lyx' and each lfun would be > | wrapped in a python function in this module. In the end you'd call > | something like > | > | lyx.CursorForward > > And how does this module communicate with the lyx process? > (Agree on how you would use the lyx module in python scripts, but that > is only a small part of the solution.) > > (My pow is that this is best done through a mechanism similar to the > lyxserver. Then we have no script/language specific mechanism inside > lyx itself.)
This smell like starting a 'SLI project (Scripting Language Independency). Is that really necessary? Andre'
