On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 09:52:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | That feels like a good decision from a security POV. Why'd anyone want to > enable > | a scripting language to be able to execute lyx::support::unlink f.ex.? > | > | What do I miss? > > >From my POV nothing.
Maybe most scripting languages have there own unlink? Apart from that I never said we should not use the LFUN interface. However, going through the lyxserver is a completely unecesary complication. Andre'
