Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars, what do you want to achieve with this discussion? The patch is small
| enough to understand it easily. You say the patch should have been
| splitted because a part of it might be controversal, but then you don't
| say what is wrong with it and that you think it would not be reverted?
What I really want is to have all of you (and me) think about these
issues. You obviously have been concious about it. Good.
(But I would probably have added the cache first in a separate
commit... but sure, we need some leeway.)
--
Lgb
