On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:05:50PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 13:54:09 +0200 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> 
> > >>>>> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 
> > > I suspect you are now referring to a different bug. I, to the
> > > note-within-inset extends-past-cell-right-edge one.
> > 
> > Actually, I believe it is the same bug:
> > wide-collapsable-inset-always-uses-the-whole-screen-enven-when-it-does-n
> > ot-need-to.
> > (and it depends whether the cursor is in the inset; that's why I tried
> > to restrict Wide() setting).
> 
> I see. I believe you are on an impossible mission. And I disagree: your "bug" 
> isn't fixable within the context of the speedup patch.

To be more precise: the wide collapsable inset uses the "whole screen"
(i.e., the maximum space made available to it by its surroundings) in
order to occupy a _fixed width_ (i.e., a width invariant for the inset's
content). It is this that makes "parsimonious" updating of only single
rows (within the inset) possible without messing up frame or background
colour rectangle.

And _of course_ you see this only when the cursor is in the inset: it is
the typing of the inset's content that we want to speed up in this way!

- Martin

Attachment: pgpeNxsJOr83N.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to