>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> What does it mean? Full-functioning frontends or some source Michael> code available? Is it realistic that the gtk frontend will be Michael> ready for 1.5 given the limited man power? I think the gtk frontend should only be kept if it manages to become fully functional. John S., do you still have plans for LyX? Is there hope? Michael> Anyway, who/what stops us from dropping xforms right now? The Michael> xforms discussion has raised a couple of times and according Michael> to my perception a majority of people voted against xforms. Michael> Who is going to make the first step? As Lars pointed out, the xforms frontend is really faster than the qt ones. I the qt wizards manage to make their frontends less sluggish (like how it was in 1.3), it would be a good reason to drop xforms. JMarc
