Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday 27 June 2006 01:33, Bo Peng wrote: | > BTW, I was using 8859-1, but 8859-15 may be better. | | Is there any reason for us not using utf-8 for 1.5?
WEll then the file must be reencoded, but sure. I'd prefere utf-8.
--
Lgb
