>>>>> "Abdel" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So there is currently _no_ linux distribution that has a qt4 >> really good enough for LyX? Is your plan to tell people that they >> should not bother about LyX if their distribution is more than one >> year old? Abdel> Last point on that issue and I'll shut up. We are talking Abdel> about LyX-1.5 which won't be out for _months_. Yes, this is what I wrote. When it is out, we should be able to support distributions that are about 2 years old. Abdel> AFAIR, the Qt4 port was started because I wanted to learn Abdel> Qt. The fact that I run windows is just an unfortunate Abdel> hazard ;-) :) Abdel> I agree that my reasons to advocate qt4 are a bit selfish. But Abdel> please take out of your mind that it is just for Windows. Abdel> Taking a decision on qt4 would make _my_ life easier as a Abdel> developer. I understand that, I know you understand this is not the best reason. Abdel> I think there are still a few thing to cleanup in the Abdel> GUI/Kernel separation and I would be relieved to not have to Abdel> worry about other frontends. I think you will find others are ready to give a hand (well, I am not really into frontends myself :). Abdel> My work is _not_ Windows specific. That said you are allowed to Abdel> think that my work is not useful ;-) Your work is _very_ useful, and I thank you for it. JMarc
