Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | | I am doing that right now... difficult.
| > No it is dead easy if you followe the 3 step rebase procedure that I
| > have posted ealier.
| | Svn rebase is dead easy with my procedure also. The problem was in the
| conflict between Peter geometry work and my cleanup work. Unless your
| merge program is much more intelligent that svn merge I don't think it
| would be any easier if I follow yours.

Ok please explain your 5 step method that is the same with every
rebase.

(And one that actually does a rebase, not one that just mergers
individual revisions in from trunk)

Actually, I don't know what a rebase is. It is not in the TortoiseSVN doc which explains how to maintain a branch and how to merge it back. That's what I followed. As for the details I sent them some time ago but I cannot find them. I basically merge sequentially until I find a potential conflict. I fix it, manually if needed, and I continue until the next potential conflict. If I do that often enough, it is dead easy to stay up to date.

Abdel.



Reply via email to