On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 09:41:57PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 05:48:29PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > | > By the way, this is written nowhere and I had the impression that > | > "gui_instance_" style was the rule in the current code. Could you > | > confirm that please because I used the "gui_instance_" style everywhere > | > already :-( > | > | I think camelBump_ style for data members is a recent addition to the > | LyX style zoo. > > No, not really... > > | I would think that most core code has underline_style_ data members. > | > | There are about > | > | 235 occurences of onlylowercase_ > | 32 occurences of lower_case_ > | 15 occurences of lowerCamelBump_ > | 4 occurences of UpperCamelBump_ > | > | in src/*.h. > | > | So according to the 'Do what is done in src/*' rule lowerCamelBump_ > | is not the prefered style. > > Short descriptive names is the prefered style. > > And as said we (as in I perhaps) have been confused with stl/boost > style. > > But our documented style has been fooBarZarg
We have abondoned Coding_Rules(?) a long time ago and used 'do whatever the majority in src/* does' Andre'
