Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| > | Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | | | UniqueGui
| > | | UniqueGuiInstance
| > | | GuiImplementation
| > | | GuiInstance
| > | | LarsGui
| > | | Ahh... you are tickling my ego.
| > | | | LyXGui
| > | | GuiGui
| > | | MyGui
| > | | MyGuiIsBig
| > | | I think I liked 'GuiInstance'
| > for the variable name that is...
|
| That would be gui_instance_ then.
Not according to our naming scheme, then it would be 'guiInstance_'.
|
| > Just Gui for the class perhaps...
|
| Nope, Gui is already taken by frontends/Gui.[Ch] and Andre explicitely
| stated he doesn't want the same name for the base class and the
| frontend version.
Then QtGui.... (Oh!)
I really don't like it but that's the only thing that would please you Ok.
but... if we never add a "using lyx::frontend::qt" and always used
'qt::Gui', and made sure to not store this in a Gui.C file, but
qtGui.C instead...
I don't follow you...
We kind of agreed to stay with the flat namespace:
everything in lyx::frontend
Abdel.
