Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes, but we have been through this ealier as well. Remember that this > is not the first time I have posted the any patch.
Only vaguely (as in I remember a patch but not what it contained). It was about a year ago, no? Judging from the comments of at least three of us, it is pretty clear that noone else remembers your earlier answers to the queries they raised this time around either. > I could have said. "No, the any patch does not close that door. We > just have to provide a more explicit mechanism." That would have been politer than "bs"... The principal point is the same irrespective of the tone we use; a documented and consistent lyxserver/minibuffer "language" and associated translation engine to boost::any LFUNs strikes me as being a large body of work. If you introduce boost::any LFUNs, you are essentially committing yourself to undertake this project. Given that you're also committed to Unicode, and the fact that you don't appear (from a distance, admittedly) to have a great deal of spare time to devote to LyX, I wonder if you're not spreading your resources too thinly. Regards, Angus
