Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 09:35:23AM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote: >> Here numbers from Windows/Linux, >> scrolling the Guide, in sec: >> >> Qt4.1.3, release, >> Linux no anti-al.: 19 >> Linux with anti-al.: 25 >> Windows 2k : 30 >> >> LyX 1.3.6, Qt 3.3.4 >> Linux no anti-al.: 6-7 >> Linux with anti-al.: 6-7 >> >> >> Is 1.5 so slow only because of Qt >> or are there also changes of LyX >> responsible for? > > There are also LyX changes that might contibute to the bad > performance. > >> -Modules, 42.530127 >> -QtGui4.dll (SymExport), 18.157461 >> QPainter::drawTextItem, 3.968417 >> QPainter::drawPixmap, 1.599013 >> QPainter::drawRects, 1.450104 >> QPainter::begin, 1.413113 >> QPainter::QPainter, 0.828970 >> QBrush::init, 0.537057 >> QBrush::cleanUp, 0.520920 >> QPainter::~QPainter, 0.421153 >> QPainter::drawText, 0.395810 >> QTextEngine::itemize, 0.377406 >> QTextEngine::shapeText, 0.308763 >> QFontMetrics::~QFontMetrics, 0.288641 >> QFontDatabase::load, 0.225289 >> QPen::operator=, 0.221603 >> QPen::QPen, 0.200135 >> [....] > > Do you have any caller tree information? > > Andre' > >
Yes, I could provide them, also the time of a call WITH all times of the nested functions.
