Andre Poenitz wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: >> Why not have namespaces to reflect the directory >> structure? >> lyx >> lyx::frontends >> lyx::frontends::qt4 >> lyx::support
> Well, maybe better than what we have now, but having > classes of the same > name only distinguished by namespace is still a pain > maintanance wise. > No decent searching e.g. What I would like to see is that the "base" classes, visible to the core, have simple names like "Painter", "WorkArea", "GuiCursor". I don't really care what the "implementation" classes in the various frontend directories are called. I'll leave it to others to debate ;-) Angus
