On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 07:47:38PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 06:31:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | > | > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > > | > | Peter Kümmel wrote: > | > | > Hi, > | > | > is there interest to also drop all functions > | > | > enabled by the QT3_SUPPORT macro? > | > | > | > | Of course there is! ;-) > | > | > | > | > If yes, why not inverting the QT3_SUPPORT macro logic: > | > | > not defining it for the whole project, but only in > | > | > front of the cpp file? > | > | > | > | Why not indeed. If you want you could provide a patch to qt.m4 and > | > | scons that will remove the QT3_SUPPORT. > | > | > | > | > Attached some patches, which frees from QT3_SUPPORT. > | > | > | > | Do you have SVN access yet? > | > > | > He will get it though. > | > | Verba volant, scripta manent. > > "Nothing is built on stone; all is built > on sand, but we must build as if the sand were stone." Jorge Louis > Borges
... and hope it doesn't crash? > | http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg90247.html > > I could'nt fine this one. Sorry, I can't parse this sentence. -- Enrico
