On Saturday 03 June 2006 13:25, Georg Baum wrote:
> I noticed too that range(222,246) would not work, but range(222,245)
> returns [222, 223, ... 244], so 245 is not handled now. José, could you
> please tell us the correct solution?

  Rewrite some of the code. I guess that there is an off by one error there.

  I will try to look to the code this weekend, now I am leaving for Scouts 
meeting. :-)

  The problem is the asymmetry between upgrade and downgrad path. I think that 
I have a clue where the problem lies.
-- 
José Abílio

Reply via email to