On Saturday 03 June 2006 13:25, Georg Baum wrote: > I noticed too that range(222,246) would not work, but range(222,245) > returns [222, 223, ... 244], so 245 is not handled now. José, could you > please tell us the correct solution?
Rewrite some of the code. I guess that there is an off by one error there. I will try to look to the code this weekend, now I am leaving for Scouts meeting. :-) The problem is the asymmetry between upgrade and downgrad path. I think that I have a clue where the problem lies. -- José Abílio