On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 04:29:15PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Samstag, 27. Mai 2006 15:20 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> > Another idea... Maybe the QApplication destruction is happening too soon
> > in the exit process, this patch remove the QLApplication destructor.
>
> This was the right idea. The 'static' LQApplication changed the
> destruction order in a way qt does not like. The attached patch fixes
> this. Please take ownership of this and commit a suitable fix.
Erm.
Is this a extreme-trial-and-error-ing contest?
If so, this should be indicated in the subject line somehow.
void foo()
{
Ptr p = new P;
...
delete p;
}
is destruction-wise equivalent to
void foo()
{
P p;
}
Moreover, the former bad style as this is not exception safe.
std::auto_ptr<P> would be better. But as long as the object fits on the
stack there is no need for dynamic allocation here.
Your problem might have been that
void foo()
{
static P p;
}
does indeed change destruction order.
Andre'
