> I have this macro defined. If my test works right, then msvc does not
> have it. This piece of code is supposed to fix this so fixing it again
> in config.h does not sound right.
>
MSVC has it, the test should not fail with msvc.
MSVC does detect it now. I am not sure what happened previously
(msvc2003?). Anyway, the fix is necessary.
Yes, including cerror is better.
It is done. If you know some previous windows compilers that do not
have this header, we should cook up a HAVE_CERRNO test.
I haven't tried to include the correct header with the posix ifdef.
PATH_MAX is now defined in the source (if it is undefined).
A scons patch will be applied soon (after the boost issue is fixed).
You do not have to apply the old patch then.
Now the headache is msvc+intl.
Bo
