On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 09:04:32AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > The problem (apart from simple bugs) is that we have some math insets that > don't support everything that is supported by their LaTeX counterpart (e.g. > xymatrix). I don't see any need for a real math ERT inset if we follow a > simple rule: If native support for some LaTeX command is implemented in > math, it must cover all possible arguments. Then we have only fully > supported commands and commands that are not supported at all, resulting in > red text. The latter should not be a problem, problematic are the > "half-supported" ones.
So you mean dropping the half-baked \xymatix support would be a good idea? Andre'
