Hi,
this removes a redundant check as proposed by Jean-Marc.
Michael
Index: BufferView_pimpl.C
===================================================================
--- BufferView_pimpl.C (Revision 13821)
+++ BufferView_pimpl.C (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1081,17 +1081,20 @@
case LFUN_CHANGES_OUTPUT: {
OutputParams runparams;
LaTeXFeatures features(*buffer_, buffer_->params(), runparams);
- flag.enabled(buffer_ && features.isAvailable("dvipost"));
+ flag.enabled(features.isAvailable("dvipost"));
flag.setOnOff(buffer_->params().output_changes);
break;
}
case LFUN_CHANGES_MERGE:
- case LFUN_CHANGE_ACCEPT: // what about these two
- case LFUN_CHANGE_REJECT: // what about these two
+ case LFUN_CHANGE_ACCEPT:
+ case LFUN_CHANGE_REJECT:
case LFUN_ALL_CHANGES_ACCEPT:
case LFUN_ALL_CHANGES_REJECT:
- flag.enabled(buffer_);
+#ifdef WITH_WARNINGS
+#warning MG: LFUNs should only be enabled if there is actually a change
+#endif
+ flag.enabled(true);
break;
case LFUN_BUFFER_TOGGLE_COMPRESSION: {
