"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > No. I want immediate proof that scons is _capable_ of replacing
| > autotools. Huge difference.
|
| Actually, I would like to free myself from the obligation of
| challenging autotools. I personally believe that scons will evolve to
| a state that can replace autotools without doubt, but it is not easy
| to prove it *now*, given its 0.96.xx status.
|
| Currently, autotools work on windows, cygwin, solaris and every linux
| variant under the sun so a replacement is not needed. As long as
| package packers can live with autotools, I have no intention to change
| the current status.
Ok, nail in the coffin then. Retire all scons stuff to the
development dir, just as was done with the vcproj stuff.
--
Lgb
