>>>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> You should have said something then. Because without Abdelrazak> anyone saying anything it's difficult to get an idea. 3 Abdelrazak> saying yes and 0 saying no... I think you get the picture. Say what? "please do not commit before showing the patch?" Do I have to say that explicitely on each and every feature I think someone may come up with some day? What would have been wrong with committing in a branch, seriously? The fact that these decisions are made only in terms of personal convenience makes it more difficult for scons to prove its personal merits. It is a pity. JMarc
