On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 06:56:52PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> | > Yes. I originally intended to wait with introducing this till we
> | > changed to xml, but I think it might be useful even now.
> | 
> | I am not qualified for an opinion in this area, just to say that all
> | these pit, id thing have confused me. I hope this introduction of uuid
> | will make things easier, not harder.
> 
> The idea is to have an identifer (similar to the id that we have now),
> but with the difference that is universally unique and stable across
> reloads of the document. (Universally unique in this setting means
> only inside the document... small unverse.)

In practice also between several documents in memory. For what it may be
good for. And the <par id="..."> thing becomes _really_ important when
posting documents on the Web, like scientific articles.

- Martin

Attachment: pgprQaeT9Vhej.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to