On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 05:50:46PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | >> BTW, I am not too happy that we use a 'Q' prefix for _our_ Qt stuff. > | > | > Feel free to change that. I agree with with you but I just followed the > | > qt2 code here. Proposal welcome for QLAction, LAction? > | > | Since it's all in namespace lyx::frontend, why not just Action ? > > Perhaps a tiny bit too generic?
There is only one frontedn active at a time. We know we are within lyx::, so no 'L' needed. 'Qt' is implicit from the configured frontend, moreover 'Q' is too easy to confuse with Qt itself. So just 'Action' looks best. Andre'
