Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It remains a matter of taste. Should we also split out > \frac and \atop? More important than runtime here is > legibility / maintainability of the source. Splitting > out classes with only trivial differences between them > leads to swarms of diminutive .[Ch] file pairs mostly > repeating each other -- not good.
I think that the best solution would be to have multiple frac-derived insets in a single file but I'm not doing the work so I'll go back and hide under my stone again. Toadishly yours, Angus
