On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 11:11:40AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>>> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Enrico> Moreover, nuking the checkbox maybe be seen as a regression... > > Nuking a checkbox is not a regression per se. Adding a pref just > because we can't make up our mind is bad. Considering that cygwin > users who want such or such kind of paths are technically apt, I'd go > as far as advocating a UI-less pref, that people can change only by > hand. This would avoid a confusing checkbox.
One way or the other, but IMO the external path style should be configurable on cygwin (and independent of the latex style paths). Btw, I think that also the win32 native version should take into account cygwin tetex and output proper path styles to .tex files when it is detected. This is already done by the configure script and it would suffice modifying accordingly os::latex_path. If nobody objects, I could do that. -- Enrico
