On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 12:10:14PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>>> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Enrico> cygwin-without-cygwin? what's that? ;-) > >> Isn't the point of this thread to support compiling with cygwin > >> -mnocygwin and (perhaps separately, I am not sure anymore) to have > >> a binary that can either be cygwin-based or not depending on the > >> phase of the moon? It may be that I missed the point, but I think > >> we should keep things simple. > > Enrico> No, you got it wrong. This for the real cygwin target. > > Well, I was answering to abdel originally, and he did say he wanted an > universal binary that would decide at runtime whether it is > cygwin-based or not.
You're right. I got it wrong ;-) > >> The interesting part, of course, is proper support for real cygwin, > >> which you address in your other message. > > Enrico> I always had addressed real cygwin. I have never spoken of > Enrico> problems related to build a native LyX with cygwin > Enrico> (cygwin-without-cygwin). > > Did I say you did? I beg your pardon, next time I'll check more closely quotations. -- Enrico
