On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 02:54:13PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Coming back to QProcess, I am sure we could use that in a clean manner > by using a virtual base class that would be inherited by a new > ForkedCall that would encapsulate QProcess. If rtti is enabled, the Lyx > kernel could choose at runtime which ForkedCall class to use depending > on the frontend. What do you think?
I'd even go as far as building a Qt based helper lib wrapping QProcess, QSettings and thte XML parsing stuff to prevent us from re-inventing the wheel again. But I doubt we'd get consensus on that. Andre'
