Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > The 2236 part looks OK. > > This is in. > > > For 2234, are you sure that \tag* works? > > I thought so, but obviously it does not work. > > > Actually, is there a need to consider it separately? > > Yes, otherwise the * will be parsed as argument of \tag. The attached patch > fixes also \tag*. Please test.
Georg, I was so happy that with your patch I could import my test latex file with ams constructs that I did not noticed that it had no starred version of \tag. Sorry. I tested your revised patch and now it also works with \tag*. Thank you. -- Enrico
