On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 13:25 +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: > On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 12:20 +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > Juergen> What's wrong with the patch? > > > > > > You seem to be arguing about it with John. > > > > The argumentation has somewhat petered out, but I'd gladly take it up again > > here. The question is whether the transformation should be done in the > > controller completely. This could be done, but then, we'd have to move some > > other things there, too. I don't know if it's worth it. > > Depends on how much work it is, and how straightforward. I like the idea > (especially since you would do the work :-) > > > > And the gtk part is missing, isn't it? > > It would solve that problem too ;-) > > > Yes. But that's not an issue for 1.4.1, or is it?
...and more seriously, as this patch is also going to live on in 1.5, it's better to do it right first time. - Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
