>>>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : >>>>>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Abdelrazak> Did you try my suggested fix for output_latex? I cannot Abdelrazak> verify it because I can't make mingw use safe_iterator. In Abdelrazak> other word are you sure that it is not a problem of Abdelrazak> output_latex instead? >> I did not try it yet, but I do not see why it would assert with >> your container and not with a vector (which has the same checks for >> end). Abdelrazak> Because std::vector puts data in a contiguous way in Abdelrazak> memory and it1-it2 is valid even if it1 is past end() The question is: how can it1 go past end without being noticed at all? I am wary of applying patches that cure symptoms. I did not see in my admittedly short look why the patch was good. >> I do not remember whether I mentioned it already, but the >> iterator::operator= entries seem strange to me. They seem to mix >> freely iterator with const_iterator. Is that intentional? Abdelrazak> Yes, those are just conversions form const_iterator to Abdelrazak> iterator, which is allowed. Beside that, these are Abdelrazak> necessary because lyx code mix freely iterator types. Are we supposed to do that? JMarc
