On Monday 06 March 2006 11:41, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>>> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jose'> On Monday 06 March 2006 10:42, Jose' Matos wrote: > >> Jean-Marc is there any reason not to maintain the papersize when > >> removing the support for a4? > > Jose'> Please ignore me, I found the reason. :-) > > What was it exactly? It is hard to tell by reading the patch alone.
If we are using a paperpackage a4* that defines the papersize. What does it means to use a3paper with a4wide? :-) What complicates things a bit what that shift in the paperpackage name. I think that Jürgen found the bug where a paperpackage was wrong because of a GUI glitch. This bug was unrelated but it is necessary to take it into account to understand lyx2lyx behaviour. What the patch does is that if the paperpackage is declared default or a4 (that was never a4) it ignores it and it uses the original paper size. > JMarc -- José Abílio
