Michael Gerz wrote: > You are right, of course. But I don't like to spend time on patches if > they are to be applied only in a few months. This must also be > frustrating for the patch developers.
I understand your frustration. And of course I'm looking forward to post-1.4.0, when some of these patches can (and will) be committed. However, I think that the deep freeze (except for real showstoppers that would break a release) is a good thing. > That's why I said that primarily we have a project management problem. > We publish one pre-release after the other but we don't dare to submit > patches that have been tested. That's just absurd. My personal opinion is that 1.4.0 should be released as it is now. But it's (fortunately) not my call. Jürgen
