Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Andre Poenitz <andre.poenitz <at> ...> writes: > | > I don't like the current release policy at all. 74 bugs targeted for > | > 1.4.1 means that 1.4 is simply not ready fore release. > | > | FWIW, this is my feeling too. > > I don't care about your feelings.
Good of you to be so honest. > You need to provide more. Which of the 74 bugs are a must for 1.4.0. > And and _why_ are they required? What I don't understand is why you're willing to ship a product with 39 known bugs for which you already have patches. It's not as if you're adhering to a tight release cycle. I guess I "just don't get it". <shrug smile="wry" humour="gentle"> Your attitude doesn't seem much different to that of Ford who allowed the Ford Pinto to go to market despite the fact that they knew that its gas tank would explode in a collision. Ford ended up recalling 1.5 million Pintos for modifications, but only after they had the pants sued of off them. http://www.autosafety.org/article.php?scid=96&did=522 </shrug> Off to crawl back under my stone again, Angus