Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 04:40:11PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 03:21:12PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | >
| > | > | > I am busy right now but I will hopefully find some time for testing
by
| > | > | > the end of next week.
| > | > |
| > | > | Let's hope the tree is open for 1.4.1 then...
| > | >
| > | > But it really should be tested somewhere else... don't you think, a
| > | > trunk or a branch.
| > |
| > | What, itching to try out branches on SVN? ;-)
| >
| > I will create my own personal tree under branches/ farily soon, I'd
| > rather keep my WIP there than on my own disk.
| >
| > branches/developers/larsbj
| >
| > or something.
| >
| > If you have a better suggestion for the /developers/ name then I'd use
| > that instead. (users, personal etc.)
|
| Why the extra level? If you go this way, /branches/<userid> would be
| fine, I think.
Perhaps... but I want these branches to be kept out of the way.
And with a separate name to put them under we make it very clear what
these branches are for.
[...]
| So that would be my proposal... trunk, after branching off 1.4, in this
| case. Generally, let's create feature branches only according to need.
Right.
--
Lgb
