Martin Vermeer wrote: > What is 1.3 behaviour (of noFontChange viz. language)?
I don't know. Therefore I wanted you to find out ;-) > And what would > you want 1.4 to do? The same ;-) Seriously, when discussing bug 1973 with Jean-Marc we came to the conclusion that noFontChange() does not do currently for what it has been designed, but that now is not the time to change it. IMHO we should not try to correct/redesign language handling now, only make it work like it does in 1.3. Georg
