On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 02:03:54PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Am Samstag, 28. Januar 2006 13:32 schrieb John Spray:
... > > I know that at the time we moved from the gtkmm 2.2 API to the 2.4 API > > there was some objection over the inconvenience of having latest > > libraries around. I appreciate this (speaking as someone who had to > > manually compile and install gtkmm into his home directory on his work > > machine...), but I really think it's worth it - I don't intend to depend > > on anything incredibly bleeding edge. > > IMHO this is a tradeoff. If the new version leads to much simpler code, > then it is worth it. Agreed. But the point in time of this trade-off is sometime in the future, when the gtk front-end is ready for mass consumer use ;-) - Martin
pgp436RfPwXHS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
