Abdel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hum, I'm no expert in that domain but maybe the linker has to "unique" > each and every methods that are defined in the duplicate headers. As > mingw gcc 3.4 has no support for precompiled header the linker has to do > this triage and this should take time, shouldn't it? (this is a > question, I'm really not knowledgeable in that field) > Maybe it's just that the mingw linker is not as optimized as the linux > one and tends to keep multiple instances of the same code in memory... > There is an experimental port of gcc 4 to mingw somewhere (thisiscoolgcc > IIRC). It might be worth a try to test if things are better with this > and precompiled header.
See message 5 in http://lists.trolltech.com/qt-interest/2004-11/thread00516-0.html -- Enrico What follows is here only to convince the gmane interface to post my article. The following errors were found. Fix them, and submit again: 1. There's much more quoted text in your article than new. Prune quoted stuff.
