Bo Peng wrote: >> I doubt that, but we can work around this. See >> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2186. We should do the same >> with .bst files that we are doing with .bib files already. > > I was under the impression that this can be done in parallel to .bib > files, may be some simple copy and paste to the .bib code. But Augus' > reply implied something more substantial.
Angus' reply is essentially similar to that of Herbert. .bst, .cls and .sty files are all essentially the same in this regard; they belong in a TeX tree. If you're not willing to create J:\tex\local (which can be mapped from C:\Some place that TeX will hate\) then you're making your own life excessively hard. IMO of course. -- Angus
