On Wednesday 28 December 2005 15:18, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > As I wrote in the bug, I am not sure we need to enforce Standard > paragraphs. Note that g-brief will probably use Letter (the default > layout) in ERT anyway. This is very bad, but it happens because we > have no notion of a 'naked style' (not defaultLayout, but some layout > that would have all characteristics set to default).
Notice also that the same happens inside table cells without fixed size. We have been able to get away with it because <para> in latex translates to nothing. Those tables inset text are another good candidate for the naked layouts. > Implementing such > a style in textclass would not be difficult (it does not need to be > declared in layout files actually), and code relying on > forceDefaultParagraph should rely on this new nakedLayout() instead of > defaultLayout(). This is not difficult to do, but more work that just > adding a Standard entry to g-brief-en. As I have told yesterday I agree with Jean-Marc that those layouts don't belong to textclasses, the same way that we don't declare the insets inset a text class file. > JMarc -- José Abílio
