Georg Baum schrieb:
> Why is this a problem? The user does not need to know at all what the
> format of the file is. What matters is the fact that LyX can open it.
> So keep always a suitable version of lyx2lyx in lib/lyx2lyx, and you
> are done.
Of course it is only necessary that LyX can open it. Only due to the
lyx2lyx bug you fixed today I realized that lyx2lyx was invoked every
time when I opened the generated LyX-file. If there is no lyx2lyx bug
nobody would mention that the lyx-file is not saved in the lyxversion of
the installed LyX.
> 1) convert test.tex -> tmp_dir/xxxx_test.lyx (format xxx) (tex2lyx)
> 2) convert tmp_dir/xxxx_test.lyx (format xxx) ->
> tmp_dir/xxxx_test_new.lyx (format yyy) (lyx2lyx)
> 3) load tmp_dir/xxxx_test_new.lyx (format yyy) in LyX,
> when the user sves this file it is copied to the directory of
> test.tex
> I like 1) and 2), because it avoids overwriting the original .tex
file > with Export->Latex, but instead of 3) I would simply keep an unnamed
> document.
Why that and where would you keep it?
But anyway if you also like 1) and 2) perhaps we should implement it in
future LyX versions.
> Besides that: What happens with master/child documents?
I've never used master/child documents.
regards Uwe
