John Levon wrote: >> > I guess the question is whether John still uses qt.m4 in oprofile... >> >> Oh, c'monnnn guys! That's just feeble. > > Why is it feeble? It's no different to using a macro from one of the > autoconf libraries. If there's no reason to fork, then don't. What does > LYX_ERROR buy?
A coherent error message, self explanatory and maintainable code in only one place? Let's turn your argument around: why not wrap LYX_ERROR on your side? If you want zero error messages that's fine. -- Angus
