On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:23:05PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:58:08PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > | > >>>>> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > > | > Martin> OK. Should we set all these values to 1000? Might unearth some > | > Martin> problems we didn't even know about. > | > > | > Why not an abstract virtual function or an assert? > | > > | > JMarc > | > | Here is the patch using abstract virtual functions. Seems to work, and > | is undoubtedly more robust, in spite of being a lot more code. > > I am not sure that I like this, especially at this stage in the > endgame of 1.4.0cvs. > > Shouldn't all insets have dimensions? In that case Dimension should > be in the base. (and I'd like to see NVI used for the methods).
OK. Happy to oblige, once I understand it :-) NVI = Nonvirtual Interface Idiom? Could you elaborate with an example? > What is the _minimal_ solution that will work just ok, for 1.4.x? > > Just adding the missing functions for these classes perhaps? > > -- > Lgb - Martin
pgpPddFxKwhd0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
