On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 02:58:01AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > | This seems a horribly euro-centric point of view. (Says the guy who can > | only speak one language...) > > I agree with that, but I also agree with Asger, that this won't be > much worse than what we have right now. And we do open up for further > refinements from such a change.
The reason I think it'd be better to try to do these in round 1 is because if we don't, there'll be little motivation to ever fix it, and we'll be excluding a large class of users as a result... Baby steps is definitely fine, but we should at least /aim/ to get this stuff done in the first attempt... > Finishing this step and removing all code now rendered cruft, might > also give us a better position to move forward with combining > characters, ligatures, bidi etc. > (cruft: intl stuff... translateAndInsert... stuff like that) Sounds like a plan. > I fear that XForms might need an upgrade to use either XwcLookup or Do we care? regards, john
