>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I am not saying that we must support everything Unicode can in Lars> 1.5, but we must at least think about this. Lars> We might decide that we don't have to worry about combining Lars> chars at all (but I fear that we have to)... Note that we do that already to some extent for arabic... Lars> Ad. Asgers idea of a class UnicodeGlyph... (I'd prefere it to Lars> not be an inset), we could have all chars in a Paragraph have Lars> that type. Internally we could use some tricks to not use too Lars> much memory for glyphs that does not need more than a single Lars> codepoint. Are we sure that characters that form a ligature should be seen as one character (meaning there shall be no line-breaking in there)? JMarc
